Advertisement 1

Kenney defends referendum bill, accuses NDP of hypocrisy on campaign spending

Article content

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney is pushing back on Opposition NDP claims that his new referendum bill is a backdoor attempt to unfairly influence debate during elections and bring big money back into politics.

“I just find it completely bizarre that anyone would characterize this (bill) as being undemocratic or, as the Opposition has said, a power grab, when in fact this is the exact opposite,” Kenney said Wednesday.

Advertisement 2
Story continues below
Article content

“This is not aggregating power to the government, but giving power to the people. There is nothing more democratic than this.”

Article content

Kenney made the comments a day after his government introduced the referendum bill along with legislation to amend senator-in-waiting elections.

He has already promised referendums to get a mandate to fight with Ottawa over changes to equalization payments and potentially one if his government decides it makes financial sense to abandon the Canada Pension Plan.

The bill would give cabinet the power to determine which issues could go to vote, how the question would be worded, when the votes would be held and whether the results would be binding.

The bill also proposes to allow third-party advertisers to spend up to $500,000 to influence public opinion on the issue at hand. Those advertisers would only have to file audited financial statements if they spend more than $350,000.

Currently, third-party advertisers can spend only $150,000 during a provincial election campaign.

Opposition NDP Leader Rachel Notley said the $500,000 ceiling along with reporting exemptions below $350,000 means deep pockets can be used to sway voter opinion, something her government took out while it was in power by lowering contribution limits.

Article content
Advertisement 3
Story continues below
Article content

Notley said the bill clears the way for Kenney to abuse it.

“He will be able to take an issue right out of the UCP campaign strategy book and invite literally hundreds of third-party organizations to spend half-a-million dollars each on those issues, potentially during the (provincial) election campaign,” she said.

“If they’re super-sneaky, they can get away without filing auditable (financial) reports if they only spend $349,000 each.

“This is classic American-style campaigning, corrupting our system.”

Kenney disagreed, saying Alberta’s referendum bill is similar to rules in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, and other jurisdictions.

He challenged Notley’s assertion that $500,000 is excessive, noting that modern campaigns are expensive.

“While it is legitimate to have a spending limit, it has to be a reasonable limit,” he said.

“You could not have a real democratic debate on an important issue through a referendum campaign if the limit were five, 10, 50 thousand dollars. Groups could not effectively communicate with millions of Albertans.”

David Taras, a professor and political commentator from Mount Royal University’s school of communication studies, said third-party advertising can make it difficult to know who the advertisers are or who they are associated with.

Advertisement 4
Story continues below
Article content

“So the question is whether the game will be tilted, the board will be tilted, because all of these third-party advertisers can tilt the board with lots of money,” he said.

Pamela Renwick, director of operations and communications with Elections Alberta, said the office made a decision about one year ago to no longer comment on pieces of legislation before they have been passed in the legislative assembly. She said Elections Alberta was consulted on both the referendum bill and the bill proposing changes to senator-in-waiting elections.

Kenney said the bill is part of broader democratic reform agenda, which will include upcoming citizen-initiated referendums and recall legislation later this year.

Kenney also accused the NDP of hypocrisy, wanting big money out of politics but being OK with millions of dollars being spent on third party-advertising by its union supporters.

“That’s just a loophole, where in this case one party is using an affiliate to do its advertising for them,” said Kenney.

Kenney said his government will introduce legislation this fall banning formal affiliates of registered political parties from operating as third-party advertisers.

With files from Ashley Joannou

Article content
Comments
You must be logged in to join the discussion or read more comments.
Join the Conversation

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Latest National Stories
    This Week in Flyers